Universitas Negeri Surabaya
Fakultas Bahasa dan Seni
Program Studi S1 Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris

Kode Dokumen

SEMESTER LEARNING PLAN

Course

KODE

Rumpun MataKuliah

Bobot Kredit

SEMESTER

Tanggal Penyusunan

Research Methods for ELT

8820303339

Mata Kuliah Wajib Program Studi

T=3

P=0

ECTS=4.77

3

24 Januari 2026

OTORISASI

Pengembang S.P

Koordinator Rumpun matakuliah

Koordinator Program Studi




Dr. Nur Chakim


Dr. Nur Chakim


HIMMAWAN ADI NUGROHO

Model Pembelajaran

Project Based Learning

Program Learning Outcomes (PLO)

PLO program Studi yang dibebankan pada matakuliah

PLO-1

Mampu menunjukkan nilai-nilai agama, kebangsaan dan budaya nasional, serta etika akademik dalam melaksanakan tugasnya

PLO-3

Mengembangkan pemikiran logis, kritis, sistematis, dan kreatif dalam melakukan pekerjaan yang spesifik di bidang keahliannya serta sesuai dengan standar kompetensi kerja bidang yang bersangkutan

PLO-11

Menciptakan produk terkait dengan pembelajaran bahasa Inggris.

Program Objectives (PO)

PO - 1

Demonstrate a thorough understanding of concepts in educational research methodology

PO - 2

Perform critical thinking and use analytical skills to solve problems in the teaching and learning of English as a foreign language

PO - 3

Demonstrate the awareness of the values, ethical issues and norms in conducting research

Matrik PLO-PO
 
POPLO-1PLO-3PLO-11
PO-1 ✔ 
PO-2  ✔
PO-3✔  

Matrik PO pada Kemampuan akhir tiap tahapan belajar (Sub-PO)
 
PO Minggu Ke
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
PO-1✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔
PO-2✔✔✔
PO-3✔

Deskripsi Singkat Mata Kuliah

This course provides an in-depth understanding of the principles, methods, and techniques used in conducting educational research. It covers both qualitative and quantitative research methods and introduces mixed-method approaches. Students will explore the research process, including problem identification, literature review, research design, data collection, data analysis, and interpretation of results. The course emphasizes developing critical skills in evaluating research studies and applying research findings to educational settings. Key topics include: Formulating research questions and hypotheses, Research designs (experimental, correlational, descriptive, case study, etc), Sampling techniques, Data collection methods (surveys, interviews, observations), Ethical considerations in educational research, Writing and presenting research proposals. By the end of the course, students will be able to critically analyze existing research and design their own research project in the form of research proposal. This course is conducted through lecturing, discussion, and presentation using project-based method.

Pustaka

Utama :

  1. (1) Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., & Sorensen, C. K. (2010). Introduction to Research in Education.. Boston: Cengage. (2) Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research Methods in Education. London: Routledge/Falmer (3) Creswell, J.W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-methods approaches. London: SAGE Publications Ltd., D., Jacobs, L. C., & Sorensen, C. K. (2010). Introduction to Research in Education. Boston: Cengage.
  2. (2) Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. 2018. Research Methods in Education . London: Routledge/Falmer
  3. (3) Bielska, J. 2011. The Experimental Method in Action Research. Katowice: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Al5skiego.
  4. (4) Burns, A. 2010. Doing Action Research in English Language Teaching: A Guide for Practitioners . New York: Routledge.

Pendukung :

  1. (3) Best, J.W. and Kahn, J.V. (2016). Research in Education. New York: Pearson Education. (4) Denzin, N.K. and Lincoln, Y.S. (2017). The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand

Dosen Pengampu

Prof. Dr. Hj. Lies Amin Lestari, M.A., M.Pd.

Fauris Zuhri, S.Pd., M.Hum.

Dr. Wiwiet Eva Savitri, S.Pd., M.Pd.

Nur Chakim, S.Pd., M.Pd.

Syafi'ul Anam, Ph.D.

Dr. Muhaimin Abdullah, S.Pd., M.Pd.

Minggu Ke-

Kemampuan akhir tiap tahapan belajar
(Sub-PO)

Penilaian

Bantuk Pembelajaran,

Metode Pembelajaran,

Penugasan Mahasiswa,

 [ Estimasi Waktu]

Materi Pembelajaran

[ Pustaka ]

Bobot Penilaian (%)

Indikator

Kriteria & Bentuk

Luring (offline)

Daring (online)

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

(8)

1

Minggu ke 1
  1. Understanding The nature of educational research Qualitative vs Quantitative research
  2. Research Ethics
  1. Menjelaskan prinsip-prinsip etika akademik dalam penelitian ELT.
  2. Mengidentifikasi pelanggaran etika dalam penelitian ELT.
 Kriteria:

90-100= Excellent, 80 -89= Good, 70-79= Fairly Good, 60-60 = Fair, 0-59= Poor


Bentuk Penilaian :
Aktifitas Partisipasif		 Discussion
 -
 Materi: Pengertian etika akademik dalam penelitian, Prinsip-prinsip etika akademik (kejujuran, integritas, keadilan, tanggung jawab), Contoh pelanggaran etika dalam penelitian ELT, Langkah-langkah merancang penelitian yang etis
Pustaka: Handbook Perkuliahan
Materi: Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., & Sorensen, C. K. (2010). Introduction to Research in Education. Boston: Cengage
Pustaka:
Materi: The nature of educational research Qualitative vs Quantitative research
Pustaka: (1) Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., & Sorensen, C. K. (2010). Introduction to Research in Education.. Boston: Cengage. (2) Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research Methods in Education. London: Routledge/Falmer (3) Creswell, J.W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-methods approaches. London: SAGE Publications Ltd., D., Jacobs, L. C., & Sorensen, C. K. (2010). Introduction to Research in Education. Boston: Cengage.
Materi: The nature of educational research Qualitative vs Quantitative research
Pustaka: 		1%

2

Minggu ke 2

Understanding Scientific approach in educational research, Mixed-Method Research
  1. To explain sources of knowledge
  2. To distinguish deductive and inductive reasoning
 Kriteria:

90-100= Excellent, 80 -89= Good, 70-79= Fairly Good, 60-60 = Fair, 0-59= Poor


Bentuk Penilaian :
Aktifitas Partisipasif		 Discussion and Presentation
 -
 Materi: Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., & Sorensen, C. K. (2010). Introduction to Research in Education. Boston: Cengage
Pustaka:
Materi: Scientific approach in educational research, Mixed-Method Research
Pustaka: (1) Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., & Sorensen, C. K. (2010). Introduction to Research in Education.. Boston: Cengage. (2) Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research Methods in Education. London: Routledge/Falmer (3) Creswell, J.W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-methods approaches. London: SAGE Publications Ltd., D., Jacobs, L. C., & Sorensen, C. K. (2010). Introduction to Research in Education. Boston: Cengage.		 1%

3

Minggu ke 3

Understanding Research problems and Objectives in educational research
  1. To define research problems
  2. To define research objectives
 Kriteria:

90 -100 = Excellent, 80 -89 = Good, 70 -79= Fairly Good, 60 -69= Fair, 0-59 = Poor


Bentuk Penilaian :
Aktifitas Partisipasif		 Discussion and Presentation
 -
 Materi: Learning Mode: Offline, Methods: Lecturing, Discussion, Case-based
Pustaka: (1) Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., & Sorensen, C. K. (2010). Introduction to Research in Education.. Boston: Cengage. (2) Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research Methods in Education. London: Routledge/Falmer (3) Creswell, J.W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-methods approaches. London: SAGE Publications Ltd., D., Jacobs, L. C., & Sorensen, C. K. (2010). Introduction to Research in Education. Boston: Cengage.
Materi: Learning Mode: Offline, Methods: Lecturing, Discussion, Case-based
Pustaka: (3) Best, J.W. and Kahn, J.V. (2016). Research in Education. New York: Pearson Education. (4) Denzin, N.K. and Lincoln, Y.S. (2017). The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand
Materi: Research problems and hypotheses in educational research
Pustaka: (1) Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., & Sorensen, C. K. (2010). Introduction to Research in Education.. Boston: Cengage. (2) Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research Methods in Education. London: Routledge/Falmer (3) Creswell, J.W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-methods approaches. London: SAGE Publications Ltd., D., Jacobs, L. C., & Sorensen, C. K. (2010). Introduction to Research in Education. Boston: Cengage.		 1%

4

Minggu ke 4

Understanding Research Assumptions and Hypotheses in Educational Research
  1. To define a hypothesis
  2. To explain the function of a hypothesis
  3. To distinguish alternative hypothesis from null ones
 Kriteria:

90 -100 = Excellent, 80 -89 = Good, 70 -79= Fairly Good, 60 -69= Fair, 0-59 = Poor


Bentuk Penilaian :
Aktifitas Partisipasif		 Discussion and Presentation
 -
 Materi: Learning Mode: Offline, Methods: Lecturing, Discussion, Case-based
Pustaka: (1) Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., & Sorensen, C. K. (2010). Introduction to Research in Education.. Boston: Cengage. (2) Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research Methods in Education. London: Routledge/Falmer (3) Creswell, J.W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-methods approaches. London: SAGE Publications Ltd., D., Jacobs, L. C., & Sorensen, C. K. (2010). Introduction to Research in Education. Boston: Cengage.
Materi: Learning Mode: Offline, Methods: Lecturing, Discussion, Case-based
Pustaka: (3) Best, J.W. and Kahn, J.V. (2016). Research in Education. New York: Pearson Education. (4) Denzin, N.K. and Lincoln, Y.S. (2017). The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand
Materi: Research Assumptions and Hypotheses in Educational Research
Pustaka: (3) Bielska, J. 2011. The Experimental Method in Action Research. Katowice: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Al5skiego.		 1%

5

Minggu ke 5

Project 1: Understanding research instruments
  1. Explaining questionnaire as research instrument
  2. Explaining Semi Structured interview as research instrument
 Kriteria:

90 -100 = Excellent, 80 -89 = Good, 70 -79= Fairly Good, 60 -69= Fair, 0-59 = Poor


Bentuk Penilaian :
Penilaian Hasil Project / Penilaian Produk		 Project and presentation
 -
 Materi: mencoba
Pustaka: (1) Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., & Sorensen, C. K. (2010). Introduction to Research in Education.. Boston: Cengage. (2) Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research Methods in Education. London: Routledge/Falmer (3) Creswell, J.W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-methods approaches. London: SAGE Publications Ltd., D., Jacobs, L. C., & Sorensen, C. K. (2010). Introduction to Research in Education. Boston: Cengage.
Materi: Project 1: Understanding research instruments
Pustaka: (1) Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., & Sorensen, C. K. (2010). Introduction to Research in Education.. Boston: Cengage. (2) Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research Methods in Education. London: Routledge/Falmer (3) Creswell, J.W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-methods approaches. London: SAGE Publications Ltd., D., Jacobs, L. C., & Sorensen, C. K. (2010). Introduction to Research in Education. Boston: Cengage.		 27%

6

Minggu ke 6

Understanding Literature Review in Educational Research

Explaining Literature Review in Educational Research

 Kriteria:

90 -100 = Excellent, 80 -89 = Good, 70 -79= Fairly Good, 60 -69= Fair, 0-59 = Poor


Bentuk Penilaian :
Aktifitas Partisipasif		 Discussion and Presentation
 -
 Materi: Prinsip-prinsip dasar penelitian ELT, Komponen proposal penelitian ELT, Teknik merumuskan masalah penelitian, Metodologi penelitian dalam ELT, Etika penelitian
Pustaka: Handbook Perkuliahan
Materi: 1. Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., & Sorensen, C. K. (2010). Introduction to Research in Education. Boston: Cengage. 2. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research Methods in Education. London: Routledge/Falmer 3. Creswell, J.W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-methods approaches. London: SAGE Publications Ltd. 4. Brown, J.D. (2014). Mixed Methods Research for TESOL. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press Ltd
Pustaka: 		1%

7

Minggu ke 7

Understanding Experimental as research methodologies

90 -100 = Excellent, 80 -89 = Good, 70 -79= Fairly Good, 60 -69= Fair, 0-59 = Poor

 Kriteria:

Explaining Experimental as research methodologies


Bentuk Penilaian :
Aktifitas Partisipasif		 Discussion and Presentation
 -
 Materi: Komponen proposal penelitian ELT, Teknik merumuskan masalah penelitian, Metodologi penelitian kualitatif/kuantitatif untuk ELT, Sistematika penulisan proposal
Pustaka: Handbook Perkuliahan		 1%

8

Minggu ke 8

Project 2: Membuat poster penelitian

Membuat proster dari hasi review artikel ilmiah dan menentukan bagian-bagian penting penelitian yaitu Judul, previous studies, research gap, research questions, significance, methods, instruments, data collection technique, data analysis.

 Kriteria:
  1. 90 -100 = Excellent, 80 -89 = Good, 70 -79= Fairly Good, 60 -69= Fair, 0-59 = Poor

Bentuk Penilaian :
Penilaian Hasil Project / Penilaian Produk		 Take Home Exam
Materi: contoh proposal penelitian
Pustaka:
Materi: contoh proposal penelitian
Pustaka:
Materi: contoh proposal penelitian
Pustaka:
Materi: Semua materi yang telah di bahas
Pustaka: (1) Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., & Sorensen, C. K. (2010). Introduction to Research in Education.. Boston: Cengage. (2) Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research Methods in Education. London: Routledge/Falmer (3) Creswell, J.W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-methods approaches. London: SAGE Publications Ltd., D., Jacobs, L. C., & Sorensen, C. K. (2010). Introduction to Research in Education. Boston: Cengage.		 30%

9

Minggu ke 9

Understanding Ex post facto as research methodologies

Explaining Ex post facto as research methodologies

 Kriteria:

Explaining Ex post facto as research methodologies


Bentuk Penilaian :
Aktifitas Partisipasif		 Discussion and Presentation
 -
 Materi: Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., & Sorensen, C. K. (2010). Introduction to Research in Education. Boston: Cengage
Pustaka: 		1%

10

Minggu ke 10

Understanding Correlational studies as a research methodology
  1. • To explain the purpose of correlational studies
  2. • To distinguish the strength and the direction of correlation
  3. • To explain how to draw the sample
 Kriteria:
  1. 90 -100 = Excellent, 80 -89 = Good, 70 -79= Fairly Good, 60 -69= Fair, 0-59 = Poor

Bentuk Penilaian :
Aktifitas Partisipasif		 Discussion and Presentation
 -
 Materi: mencoba mengisi materi di daftar pustaka dan bisa tersimpan
Pustaka: (3) Best, J.W. and Kahn, J.V. (2016). Research in Education. New York: Pearson Education. (4) Denzin, N.K. and Lincoln, Y.S. (2017). The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand		 1%

11

Minggu ke 11

Understanding Surveys as a research methodology

90 -100 = Excellent, 80 -89 = Good, 70 -79= Fairly Good, 60 -69= Fair, 0-59 = Poor

 Kriteria:

To explain Surveys as a research methodology


Bentuk Penilaian :
Aktifitas Partisipasif		 Discussion and Presentation
 -
 Materi: Surveys as a research methodology
Pustaka: (1) Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., & Sorensen, C. K. (2010). Introduction to Research in Education.. Boston: Cengage. (2) Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research Methods in Education. London: Routledge/Falmer (3) Creswell, J.W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-methods approaches. London: SAGE Publications Ltd., D., Jacobs, L. C., & Sorensen, C. K. (2010). Introduction to Research in Education. Boston: Cengage.		 1%

12

Minggu ke 12

Understanding Basic Interpretive Research as a research methodology
  2. Explaining Basic Interpretive Research as a research methodology
 Kriteria:

90 -100 = Excellent, 80 -89 = Good, 70 -79= Fairly Good, 60 -69= Fair, 0-59 = Poor


Bentuk Penilaian :
Aktifitas Partisipasif		 Discussion and Presentation
 -
 Materi: Interpretative research
Pustaka: (1) Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., & Sorensen, C. K. (2010). Introduction to Research in Education.. Boston: Cengage. (2) Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research Methods in Education. London: Routledge/Falmer (3) Creswell, J.W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-methods approaches. London: SAGE Publications Ltd., D., Jacobs, L. C., & Sorensen, C. K. (2010). Introduction to Research in Education. Boston: Cengage.		 1%

13

Minggu ke 13

Understanding Case Studies as a research methodology
  1. • To explain the purposes of case studies
  2. • To explain the characteristics of case studies
  3. • To distinguish different types of case studies
 Kriteria:

90 -100 = Excellent, 80 -89 = Good, 70 -79= Fairly Good, 60 -69= Fair, 0-59 = Poor


Bentuk Penilaian :
Aktifitas Partisipasif		 Discussion and Presentation
Materi: Case studies
Pustaka: (1) Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., & Sorensen, C. K. (2010). Introduction to Research in Education.. Boston: Cengage. (2) Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research Methods in Education. London: Routledge/Falmer (3) Creswell, J.W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-methods approaches. London: SAGE Publications Ltd., D., Jacobs, L. C., & Sorensen, C. K. (2010). Introduction to Research in Education. Boston: Cengage.
Materi: contoh proposal penelitian
Pustaka: 		1%

14

Minggu ke 14

Understanding Research and Development (R&D) as a research methodology
  1. • To explain the purposes of Research and Development (R&D)
  2. • To explain the characteristics of Research and Development (R&D)
  3. • To distinguish different types of Research and Development (R&D)
 Kriteria:

90 -100 = Excellent, 80 -89 = Good, 70 -79= Fairly Good, 60 -69= Fair, 0-59 = Poor


Bentuk Penilaian :
Aktifitas Partisipasif		 Discussion and Presentation
 -
 Materi: Surveys as a research methodology
Pustaka: (1) Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., & Sorensen, C. K. (2010). Introduction to Research in Education.. Boston: Cengage. (2) Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research Methods in Education. London: Routledge/Falmer (3) Creswell, J.W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-methods approaches. London: SAGE Publications Ltd., D., Jacobs, L. C., & Sorensen, C. K. (2010). Introduction to Research in Education. Boston: Cengage.
Materi: Surveys as a research methodology
Pustaka: (1) Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., & Sorensen, C. K. (2010). Introduction to Research in Education.. Boston: Cengage. (2) Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research Methods in Education. London: Routledge/Falmer (3) Creswell, J.W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-methods approaches. London: SAGE Publications Ltd., D., Jacobs, L. C., & Sorensen, C. K. (2010). Introduction to Research in Education. Boston: Cengage.
Materi: Research and Development (R&D) as a research methodology
Pustaka: (1) Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., & Sorensen, C. K. (2010). Introduction to Research in Education.. Boston: Cengage. (2) Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research Methods in Education. London: Routledge/Falmer (3) Creswell, J.W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-methods approaches. London: SAGE Publications Ltd., D., Jacobs, L. C., & Sorensen, C. K. (2010). Introduction to Research in Education. Boston: Cengage.		 1%

15

Minggu ke 15

Understanding Action research as a research methodology

Explaining Action research as a research methodology

 Kriteria:

90 -100 = Excellent, 80 -89 = Good, 70 -79= Fairly Good, 60 -69= Fair, 0-59 = Poor


Bentuk Penilaian :
Aktifitas Partisipasif		 Discussion and Presentation
 -
 Materi: Action research as a research methodology
Pustaka: (3) Best, J.W. and Kahn, J.V. (2016). Research in Education. New York: Pearson Education. (4) Denzin, N.K. and Lincoln, Y.S. (2017). The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand
Materi: Action research as a research methodology
Pustaka: (1) Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., & Sorensen, C. K. (2010). Introduction to Research in Education.. Boston: Cengage. (2) Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research Methods in Education. London: Routledge/Falmer (3) Creswell, J.W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-methods approaches. London: SAGE Publications Ltd., D., Jacobs, L. C., & Sorensen, C. K. (2010). Introduction to Research in Education. Boston: Cengage.
Materi: Action research as a research methodology
Pustaka: (1) Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., & Sorensen, C. K. (2010). Introduction to Research in Education.. Boston: Cengage. (2) Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research Methods in Education. London: Routledge/Falmer (3) Creswell, J.W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-methods approaches. London: SAGE Publications Ltd., D., Jacobs, L. C., & Sorensen, C. K. (2010). Introduction to Research in Education. Boston: Cengage.
Materi: Action research as a research methodology
Pustaka: (1) Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., & Sorensen, C. K. (2010). Introduction to Research in Education.. Boston: Cengage. (2) Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research Methods in Education. London: Routledge/Falmer (3) Creswell, J.W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-methods approaches. London: SAGE Publications Ltd., D., Jacobs, L. C., & Sorensen, C. K. (2010). Introduction to Research in Education. Boston: Cengage.		 1%

16

Minggu ke 16

Developing Research Proposal (Final Examination/ project)

To Develop research porposal containing Introduction, Research Questions, Research Design, Research Subject, Instruments, Data Colelction Technique, Data Analysis.

 Kriteria:

90 -100 = Excellent, 80 -89 = Good, 70 -79= Fairly Good, 60 -69= Fair, 0-59 = Poor


Bentuk Penilaian :
Penilaian Hasil Project / Penilaian Produk		 Project 3: Take Home Exam
 -
 Materi: developing research proposal
Pustaka: (1) Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., & Sorensen, C. K. (2010). Introduction to Research in Education.. Boston: Cengage. (2) Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research Methods in Education. London: Routledge/Falmer (3) Creswell, J.W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-methods approaches. London: SAGE Publications Ltd., D., Jacobs, L. C., & Sorensen, C. K. (2010). Introduction to Research in Education. Boston: Cengage.
Materi: Semua materi
Pustaka: (1) Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., & Sorensen, C. K. (2010). Introduction to Research in Education.. Boston: Cengage. (2) Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research Methods in Education. London: Routledge/Falmer (3) Creswell, J.W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-methods approaches. London: SAGE Publications Ltd., D., Jacobs, L. C., & Sorensen, C. K. (2010). Introduction to Research in Education. Boston: Cengage.		 30%



Rekap Persentase Evaluasi : Project Based Learning

No Evaluasi Persentase
1. Aktifitas Partisipasif 13%
2. Penilaian Hasil Project / Penilaian Produk 87%
100%

Catatan

  1. Capaian Pembelajaran Lulusan Program Studi (PLO - Program Studi) adalah kemampuan yang dimiliki oleh setiap lulusan Program Studi yang merupakan internalisasi dari sikap, penguasaan pengetahuan dan ketrampilan sesuai dengan jenjang prodinya yang diperoleh melalui proses pembelajaran.
  2. PLO yang dibebankan pada mata kuliah adalah beberapa capaian pembelajaran lulusan program studi (CPL-Program Studi) yang digunakan untuk pembentukan/pengembangan sebuah mata kuliah yang terdiri dari aspek sikap, ketrampulan umum, ketrampilan khusus dan pengetahuan.
  3. Program Objectives (PO) adalah kemampuan yang dijabarkan secara spesifik dari PLO yang dibebankan pada mata kuliah, dan bersifat spesifik terhadap bahan kajian atau materi pembelajaran mata kuliah tersebut.
  4. Sub-PO Mata kuliah (Sub-PO) adalah kemampuan yang dijabarkan secara spesifik dari PO yang dapat diukur atau diamati dan merupakan kemampuan akhir yang direncanakan pada tiap tahap pembelajaran, dan bersifat spesifik terhadap materi pembelajaran mata kuliah tersebut.
  5. Indikator penilaian kemampuan dalam proses maupun hasil belajar mahasiswa adalah pernyataan spesifik dan terukur yang mengidentifikasi kemampuan atau kinerja hasil belajar mahasiswa yang disertai bukti-bukti.
  6. Kreteria Penilaian adalah patokan yang digunakan sebagai ukuran atau tolok ukur ketercapaian pembelajaran dalam penilaian berdasarkan indikator-indikator yang telah ditetapkan. Kreteria penilaian merupakan pedoman bagi penilai agar penilaian konsisten dan tidak bias. Kreteria dapat berupa kuantitatif ataupun kualitatif.
  7. Bentuk penilaian: tes dan non-tes.
  8. Bentuk pembelajaran: Kuliah, Responsi, Tutorial, Seminar atau yang setara, Praktikum, Praktik Studio, Praktik Bengkel, Praktik Lapangan, Penelitian, Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat dan/atau bentuk pembelajaran lain yang setara.
  9. Metode Pembelajaran: Small Group Discussion, Role-Play & Simulation, Discovery Learning, Self-Directed Learning, Cooperative Learning, Collaborative Learning, Contextual Learning, Project Based Learning, dan metode lainnya yg setara.
  10. Materi Pembelajaran adalah rincian atau uraian dari bahan kajian yg dapat disajikan dalam bentuk beberapa pokok dan sub-pokok bahasan.
  11. Bobot penilaian adalah prosentasi penilaian terhadap setiap pencapaian sub-PO yang besarnya proposional dengan tingkat kesulitan pencapaian sub-PO tsb., dan totalnya 100%.
  12. TM=Tatap Muka, PT=Penugasan terstruktur, BM=Belajar mandiri.