Universitas Negeri Surabaya
Fakultas Bahasa dan Seni
Program Studi S1 Sastra Inggris

Kode Dokumen

SEMESTER LEARNING PLAN

Course

KODE

Rumpun MataKuliah

Bobot Kredit

SEMESTER

Tanggal Penyusunan

Academic Writing For Research Purpose In Linguistic

7920204348

Mata Kuliah Wajib Program Studi

T=4

P=0

ECTS=6.36

4

7 Desember 2025

OTORISASI

Pengembang S.P

Koordinator Rumpun matakuliah

Koordinator Program Studi

.......................................

.......................................

ALI MUSTOFA

Program Learning Outcomes (PLO)

PLO program Studi yang dibebankan pada matakuliah

PLO-3

Mengembangkan pemikiran logis, kritis, sistematis, dan kreatif dalam melakukan pekerjaan yang spesifik di bidang keahliannya serta sesuai dengan standar kompetensi kerja bidang yang bersangkutan

PLO-10

Mampu menghasilkan karya akademik atau non-akademik dengan baik dalam bentuk lisan maupun tulisan untuk beragam audiens dan tujuan

PLO-11

Mampu mendemonstrasikan kemampuan berbahasa Inggris, yang ditunjukkan dengan pencapaian skor tes kemampuan Bahasa Inggris yang setara dengan minimal CEFR level B2

Program Objectives (PO)

PO - 1

Identify and evaluate academic sources relevant to linguistics topics.

PO - 2

Apply academic reading strategies and avoid plagiarism through effective paraphrasing, summarizing, and proper referencing.

PO - 3

Produce well-organized academic texts with coherent structure and appropriate use of sources.

PO - 4

Synthesize multiple linguistic sources into a structured literature review paper with argumentation and critical thinking.

PO - 5

Demonstrate advanced English writing skills equivalent to CEFR level B2.

Matrik PLO-PO

Matrik PO pada Kemampuan akhir tiap tahapan belajar (Sub-PO)

Deskripsi Singkat Mata Kuliah

This course is designed to enhance students‘ academic writing skills with a focus on research-based writing, critical thinking, and scholarly communication. The course covers essential aspects, including structuring research papers, synthesizing sources, developing arguments, and adhering to academic integrity standards. Teaching methods include interactive lectures, peer reviews, writing workshops, and practical exercises that engage students in real-world academic writing scenarios. The course aligns with the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), specifically SDG 4 (Quality Education), SDG 5 (Gender Equality), SDG 10 (Reduced Inequalities), and SDG 16 (Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions) by fostering research literacy and effective communication in academic and professional settings. Assessment is based on research proposals, annotated bibliographies, draft submissions, and final research papers, with continuous feedback provided to support students‘ writing development.

Pustaka

Utama :

1. Bailey, Stephen. (2018). Academic Writing: A Handbook for International Students. Fifth edition. London & New York: Routledge.

Pendukung :

1. https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/general_writing/common_writing_assignments/annotated_bibliographies/annotated_bibliography_samples.html
2. https://www.mybib.com/#/projects/dzVvwy/citations
3. https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/general_writing/common_writing_assignments/annotated_bibliographies/index.html
4. https://www.phrasebank.manchester.ac.uk/
5. https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/apa_style/apa_formatting_and_style_guide/index.html
6. https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/general_writing/common_writing_assignments/annotated_bibliographies/annotated_bibliography_samples.html
7. https://subjectguides.york.ac.uk/note-taking/home
8. https://www.utc.edu/enrollment-management-and-student-affairs/center-for-academic-support-and-advisement/tips-for-academic-success/note-taking
9. https://www.ncl.ac.uk/academic-skills-kit/writing/academic-writing/reporting-verbs/
10. https://www.jstor.org/action/doBasicSearch?Query=Linguistics&so=rel
11. https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/general_writing/academic_writing/index.html

Dosen Pengampu

Prof. Slamet Setiawan, M.A., Ph.D.

Dr. Dian Rivia Himmawati, S.S., M.Hum.

Ayunita Leliana, S.S., M.Pd.

Fariq Shiddiq Tasaufy, S.S., M.Hum.

Cicilia Deandra Maya Putri, S.Hum., M.A.

Minggu Ke-

Kemampuan akhir tiap tahapan belajar
(Sub-PO)

Penilaian

Bantuk Pembelajaran,

Metode Pembelajaran,

Penugasan Mahasiswa,

 [ Estimasi Waktu]

Materi Pembelajaran

[ Pustaka ]

Bobot Penilaian (%)

Indikator

Kriteria & Bentuk

Luring (offline)

Daring (online)

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

(8)

1

Minggu ke 1

1. Correctly lists key features of academic writing (e.g., objectivity, formality, evidence-based, coherence).
2. Demonstrates understanding through accurate definitions and examples.
3. Accurately defines what primary and secondary sources are.
4. Provides clear examples of each (e.g., interview = primary; journal article reviewing research = secondary).
5. Explains why a source is classified as primary or secondary

2

Minggu ke 2

1. Using critical reading methods, identifying text features and key arguments.
2. Efficiently locating specific information using scanning.
3. Identifying main ideas and general meaning using skimming.
4. Notes include key points, supporting details, and are logically structured.
5. Identifying examples of both plagiarism and acceptable paraphrasing.
6. Demonstrating ability to cite and paraphrase correctly (APA/MLA style, if required).

3

Minggu ke 3

1. Identifiying task words (e.g., compare, analyze) and content words accurately.
2. Identifying research question ( Rq is clear, specific, and addresses a focused issue)
3. Each step is clearly connected to answering the research question
4. Writing a planning which includes logical steps such as brainstorming, outlining, searching sources, or identifying methods.

4

Minggu ke 4

extracting arguments, methodology, and findings from academic articles

5

Minggu ke 5

1. Accuracy of Content
2. Use of Own Words and Sentence Structure
3. Conciseness and Coherence
4. Proper Use of Academic Conventions
5. Paraphrased text is reworded with different vocabulary and structure (No copying of phrases longer than 3–4 words (unless technical terms).
6. Summary is significantly shorter than the original text, which the Ideas are logically organized and easy to follow.
7. Follows required citation style (e.g., APA/MLA).

6

Minggu ke 6

1. Accuracy of In-Text Citations
2. Completeness and Accuracy of References
3. Correct format: (Author, year) or (Author, year, p. xx) when quoting.
4. Proper use of signal phrases when needed (e.g., According to Smith, 2022…).
5. All sources cited in-text appear in the reference list.
6. Each reference includes all required elements (author, year, title, source, etc.).
7. Follows correct APA/MLA/Vancouver formatting (e.g., italicization, capitalization, indentation)

7

Minggu ke 7

1. Sources are compared, contrasted, or combined to support a central argument.
2. Clear thesis or focus is maintained throughout the draft.
3. Transitions and logical connectors are used effectively.
4. Key points from sources are paraphrased accurately.
5. Summaries are concise and retain essential meaning.
6. Citaion format is applied consistently.
7. Uses formal, objective, and academic tone.
8. Sentence structures are varied and clear

8

Minggu ke 8

Annotated entries covering the main purpose or idea of the work, the contents, the author's conclusions, the intended audeince, the author's research methods

9

Minggu ke 9

1. The topic sentence is directly connected to the thesis or overall argument.
2. Supporting details (examples, data, explanations) are relevant and specific.
3. Appropriate use of transition words and phrases within the paragraph (e.g., furthermore, however, for example).
4. All sentences relate to the main idea without digressions.
5. Uses appropriate academic vocabulary and grammar and maintains formal, objective tone.

10

Minggu ke 10

1. Effectiveness of the Introduction
2. Relevance and Clarity of Thesis Statement
3. Effectiveness of the Conclusion
4. Coherence and Consistency
5. Language Use and Academic Style

11

Minggu ke 11

1. Organizational Structure and Coherence
2. Clarity and Relevance of Supporting Claims
3. Paragraphs follow a logical structure for the chosen mode (e.g., Examplefication, Generalizations, and Problems and Solutions, point-by-point comparison, logical sequencing of causes and effects).
4. Supporting evidence or examples are relevant to the mode (e.g., reasons for argument, causes/effects, points of comparison).
5. Claims are supported with concrete evidence, examples, reasoning, and/or explanations appropriate to the rhetorical pattern.

12

Minggu ke 12

Clarity and Specificity of Thesis Statement

13

Minggu ke 13

1. Reading and Evaluating the Literature Critically
2. Identifying Gaps
3. Structuring the review (Thematic (topic-based) Chronological (historical development) Methodological (types of methods used) Theoretical (based on frameworks)

14

Minggu ke 14

1. Reading and Evaluating the Literature Critically
2. Identifying Gaps
3. Structuring the review (Thematic (topic-based) Chronological (historical development) Methodological (types of methods used) Theoretical (based on frameworks)

15

Minggu ke 15

1. Reading and Evaluating the Literature Critically
2. Identifying Gaps
3. Structuring the review (Thematic (topic-based) Chronological (historical development) Methodological (types of methods used) Theoretical (based on frameworks)

16

Minggu ke 16

1. The literature review summarizes relevant sources accurately and demonstrates understanding of the topic.
2. The literature review follows a logical structure with clear introduction, thematic development, and conclusion.
3. Sources are synthesized (not just listed), compared, and critically evaluated in relation to the research topic.
4. In-text citations and reference list follow APA style consistently and correctly.
5. The written text (and spoken delivery, if applicable) uses formal academic language, correct grammar, and discipline-appropriate vocabulary.